<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1985 (9) TMI 2 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=5904</link>
    <description>Receipts with a direct and intimate nexus to an assessee&#039;s vocational activity constitute income arising from that vocation. The amounts here were paid to support the assessee&#039;s preaching and propagation of religious views through a newspaper, and they continued while that activity continued; they were therefore not personal gifts divorced from the work. Once characterised as vocational income, the receipts could not qualify as casual and non-recurring receipts exempt under section 4(3)(vii) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922. The Supreme Court accordingly treated the amounts as taxable income arising from the assessee&#039;s vocation and denied the exemption.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 Sep 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=44987" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1985 (9) TMI 2 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=5904</link>
      <description>Receipts with a direct and intimate nexus to an assessee&#039;s vocational activity constitute income arising from that vocation. The amounts here were paid to support the assessee&#039;s preaching and propagation of religious views through a newspaper, and they continued while that activity continued; they were therefore not personal gifts divorced from the work. Once characterised as vocational income, the receipts could not qualify as casual and non-recurring receipts exempt under section 4(3)(vii) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922. The Supreme Court accordingly treated the amounts as taxable income arising from the assessee&#039;s vocation and denied the exemption.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Sep 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=5904</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>