<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (11) TMI 1274 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335256</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the adjudicating authority&#039;s decision to classify &quot;Cetraben Cream&quot; as cosmetics, ruling in favor of the appellant&#039;s classification of the product as a medicament. Citing previous classification in the appellant&#039;s case and authoritative judicial pronouncements, the Tribunal deemed the impugned order unsustainable and allowed the appeal, emphasizing the product&#039;s medicinal classification over consumer usage.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2016 09:43:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=449852" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (11) TMI 1274 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335256</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the adjudicating authority&#039;s decision to classify &quot;Cetraben Cream&quot; as cosmetics, ruling in favor of the appellant&#039;s classification of the product as a medicament. Citing previous classification in the appellant&#039;s case and authoritative judicial pronouncements, the Tribunal deemed the impugned order unsustainable and allowed the appeal, emphasizing the product&#039;s medicinal classification over consumer usage.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335256</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>