<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (11) TMI 1272 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335254</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, holding that the principle of unjust enrichment did not apply to the refund claim of Cenvat credit on packing material. The Tribunal determined that the disputed amount was akin to availing fresh Cenvat credit, not a refund of excise duty on final products, thus allowing the appeal in favor of the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Apr 2017 13:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=449850" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (11) TMI 1272 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335254</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, holding that the principle of unjust enrichment did not apply to the refund claim of Cenvat credit on packing material. The Tribunal determined that the disputed amount was akin to availing fresh Cenvat credit, not a refund of excise duty on final products, thus allowing the appeal in favor of the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335254</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>