<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (11) TMI 1269 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335251</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the confiscation of the imported ship for violating ITC provisions, clarified the waiver of show-cause notice by the importer, and determined that the motor tanker qualified as a vessel under the ITC Policy. The decision was based on a thorough analysis of the legal provisions and definitions relevant to the case, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Apr 2017 12:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=449845" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (11) TMI 1269 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335251</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the confiscation of the imported ship for violating ITC provisions, clarified the waiver of show-cause notice by the importer, and determined that the motor tanker qualified as a vessel under the ITC Policy. The decision was based on a thorough analysis of the legal provisions and definitions relevant to the case, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335251</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>