<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (11) TMI 1266 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335248</link>
    <description>The application for rectification of the mistake in the interim order was dismissed by the Tribunal. The Tribunal highlighted the importance of disciplined behavior, adherence to judicial norms, and the limited scope of rectification to errors apparent on the record. Additionally, costs of Rs. 10,000 were imposed on the applicant-Commissioner to be paid into the Prime Minister&#039;s Relief Fund within 45 days, emphasizing the need to prevent frivolous litigation and ensure responsible conduct by Revenue representatives.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Aug 2017 18:02:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=449842" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (11) TMI 1266 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335248</link>
      <description>The application for rectification of the mistake in the interim order was dismissed by the Tribunal. The Tribunal highlighted the importance of disciplined behavior, adherence to judicial norms, and the limited scope of rectification to errors apparent on the record. Additionally, costs of Rs. 10,000 were imposed on the applicant-Commissioner to be paid into the Prime Minister&#039;s Relief Fund within 45 days, emphasizing the need to prevent frivolous litigation and ensure responsible conduct by Revenue representatives.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335248</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>