<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (11) TMI 1260 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335242</link>
    <description>The Gujarat HC sanctioned the scheme of amalgamation after finding that the requisite consents were obtained, no objections were filed after publication, the Official Liquidator reported no prejudicial conduct in the transferor company&#039;s affairs, and the Regional Director&#039;s concerns were answered by additional affidavit. It also held that, where the scheme adopted the pooling of interest method and any deviation from accounting standards was disclosed in the first financial statements, no further condition was required to restrict dividend distribution out of reserves. The scheme was found fair, beneficial to shareholders and creditors, and not contrary to public interest, so the request for an additional dividend restriction was declined.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2016 08:47:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=449834" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (11) TMI 1260 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335242</link>
      <description>The Gujarat HC sanctioned the scheme of amalgamation after finding that the requisite consents were obtained, no objections were filed after publication, the Official Liquidator reported no prejudicial conduct in the transferor company&#039;s affairs, and the Regional Director&#039;s concerns were answered by additional affidavit. It also held that, where the scheme adopted the pooling of interest method and any deviation from accounting standards was disclosed in the first financial statements, no further condition was required to restrict dividend distribution out of reserves. The scheme was found fair, beneficial to shareholders and creditors, and not contrary to public interest, so the request for an additional dividend restriction was declined.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335242</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>