<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (7) TMI 674 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188367</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court upheld the validity of the cut-off date fixed by the State of Rajasthan for determining the maximum age of candidates for direct recruitment, ruling it neither arbitrary nor unreasonable. The Court dismissed candidates&#039; appeals challenging the cut-off date, allowed the State&#039;s appeals, clarified age relaxation provisions, and determined that the dismissal of a Special Leave Petition did not make the High Court&#039;s decision final regarding an individual&#039;s appointment. The Court set aside Division Benches&#039; judgments and upheld the Full Bench&#039;s reasoning on the cut-off date issue. No costs were awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2016 17:12:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=449811" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (7) TMI 674 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188367</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court upheld the validity of the cut-off date fixed by the State of Rajasthan for determining the maximum age of candidates for direct recruitment, ruling it neither arbitrary nor unreasonable. The Court dismissed candidates&#039; appeals challenging the cut-off date, allowed the State&#039;s appeals, clarified age relaxation provisions, and determined that the dismissal of a Special Leave Petition did not make the High Court&#039;s decision final regarding an individual&#039;s appointment. The Court set aside Division Benches&#039; judgments and upheld the Full Bench&#039;s reasoning on the cut-off date issue. No costs were awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188367</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>