<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (7) TMI 1008 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188363</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the Assessing Authority&#039;s decision to reject depreciation claim based on inflated equipment values, directing a re-examination to align sale invoice value with actual market value. The Tribunal emphasized verifying supplier information and assessing market price independently. The decision clarified that the remand allowed Assessing Authority discretion to evaluate sale value using relevant materials.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2016 14:47:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=449805" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (7) TMI 1008 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188363</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the Assessing Authority&#039;s decision to reject depreciation claim based on inflated equipment values, directing a re-examination to align sale invoice value with actual market value. The Tribunal emphasized verifying supplier information and assessing market price independently. The decision clarified that the remand allowed Assessing Authority discretion to evaluate sale value using relevant materials.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188363</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>