<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (11) TMI 1250 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335232</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found the Assessing Officer&#039;s order to be erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of Revenue. While modifying the direction to adopt 5% of the gross receipts, the Tribunal emphasized the need for a fresh examination of the books of account by the AO. The assessment proceedings were set aside and restored to the AO&#039;s file for detailed examination, and the direction to initiate penalty proceedings was also modified.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2016 13:03:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=449790" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (11) TMI 1250 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335232</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found the Assessing Officer&#039;s order to be erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of Revenue. While modifying the direction to adopt 5% of the gross receipts, the Tribunal emphasized the need for a fresh examination of the books of account by the AO. The assessment proceedings were set aside and restored to the AO&#039;s file for detailed examination, and the direction to initiate penalty proceedings was also modified.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335232</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>