<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (11) TMI 1240 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335222</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal for statistical purposes, remitting the case back to the Assessing Officer (AO) for fresh consideration. The AO was directed to review additional evidence presented by the assessee, including explanations for cash deposits from agricultural activities and land sales. The Tribunal stressed the importance of a comprehensive assessment of the new evidence to reach a fair decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2016 12:37:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=449779" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (11) TMI 1240 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335222</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal for statistical purposes, remitting the case back to the Assessing Officer (AO) for fresh consideration. The AO was directed to review additional evidence presented by the assessee, including explanations for cash deposits from agricultural activities and land sales. The Tribunal stressed the importance of a comprehensive assessment of the new evidence to reach a fair decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335222</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>