<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1985 (3) TMI 3 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=5894</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court upheld the High Court&#039;s decision, dismissing the appeals and special leave petitions without costs. The appellant&#039;s contentions regarding tax credit eligibility under the Tax Credit Certificate Scheme, 1965, and the limitation for filing supplementary applications were rejected. The court emphasized that the duty of excise chargeable under the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944, is crucial for tax credit eligibility, dismissing the inclusion of special excise duty under the Finance Act for tax credit purposes. The appellant&#039;s supplementary application was deemed time-barred under the Scheme&#039;s provisions, with no authority to condone the delay.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Mar 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Dec 2014 10:38:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=44977" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1985 (3) TMI 3 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=5894</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court upheld the High Court&#039;s decision, dismissing the appeals and special leave petitions without costs. The appellant&#039;s contentions regarding tax credit eligibility under the Tax Credit Certificate Scheme, 1965, and the limitation for filing supplementary applications were rejected. The court emphasized that the duty of excise chargeable under the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944, is crucial for tax credit eligibility, dismissing the inclusion of special excise duty under the Finance Act for tax credit purposes. The appellant&#039;s supplementary application was deemed time-barred under the Scheme&#039;s provisions, with no authority to condone the delay.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Mar 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=5894</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>