<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1985 (3) TMI 235 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=5892</link>
    <description>The Court dismissed the appeals as the Revenue failed to establish that the wealth-tax liabilities were outstanding on the valuation dates and that the assessee&#039;s challenges to the tax amounts met the requirements of section 2(m)(iii)(a) of the Wealth Tax Act. The judgment clarified the interpretation of the provision and highlighted the significance of timing in appealing tax liabilities for claiming deductions in wealth tax assessments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Mar 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2014 18:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=44975" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1985 (3) TMI 235 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=5892</link>
      <description>The Court dismissed the appeals as the Revenue failed to establish that the wealth-tax liabilities were outstanding on the valuation dates and that the assessee&#039;s challenges to the tax amounts met the requirements of section 2(m)(iii)(a) of the Wealth Tax Act. The judgment clarified the interpretation of the provision and highlighted the significance of timing in appealing tax liabilities for claiming deductions in wealth tax assessments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Mar 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=5892</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>