<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (11) TMI 1238 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335220</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal remitted the issues back to the Assessing Officer for fresh consideration. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of effective control to prevent repetitive claims of bad debts without actual write-offs and highlighted the need to adhere to legal precedents in determining deductions and allowances for the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2016 12:32:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=449744" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (11) TMI 1238 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335220</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal remitted the issues back to the Assessing Officer for fresh consideration. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of effective control to prevent repetitive claims of bad debts without actual write-offs and highlighted the need to adhere to legal precedents in determining deductions and allowances for the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335220</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>