<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (11) TMI 1236 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335218</link>
    <description>Licence fee paid for the right to use an associated company&#039;s goodwill and name was treated as deductible under section 37(1) where the arrangement was documented, commercially structured, and necessary to carry on the profession; allegations of tax avoidance failed absent legal prohibition or material showing of sham. The commentary also notes that disallowance of secretarial, accounting and other support services payment was not sustained because the lower appellate finding was based on an incorrect view of the partnership deed and no infirmity in the factual conclusion was shown. Entertainment expense relating to a celebration was likewise allowed, with no material error established in the appellate allowance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2016 12:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=449741" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (11) TMI 1236 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335218</link>
      <description>Licence fee paid for the right to use an associated company&#039;s goodwill and name was treated as deductible under section 37(1) where the arrangement was documented, commercially structured, and necessary to carry on the profession; allegations of tax avoidance failed absent legal prohibition or material showing of sham. The commentary also notes that disallowance of secretarial, accounting and other support services payment was not sustained because the lower appellate finding was based on an incorrect view of the partnership deed and no infirmity in the factual conclusion was shown. Entertainment expense relating to a celebration was likewise allowed, with no material error established in the appellate allowance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335218</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>