<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1984 (12) TMI 1 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=5887</link>
    <description>The SC upheld the lower courts&#039; rulings, favoring the assessee on both issues. It affirmed that interest charges for delayed income tax return filings were justified due to the ITO&#039;s extension of deadlines. Additionally, the SC supported the Appellate Tribunal&#039;s cancellation of penalties under section 271(1)(a), as the extended filing time was considered part of the allowed period. The appeals were dismissed with costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Dec 2024 13:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=44970" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1984 (12) TMI 1 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=5887</link>
      <description>The SC upheld the lower courts&#039; rulings, favoring the assessee on both issues. It affirmed that interest charges for delayed income tax return filings were justified due to the ITO&#039;s extension of deadlines. Additionally, the SC supported the Appellate Tribunal&#039;s cancellation of penalties under section 271(1)(a), as the extended filing time was considered part of the allowed period. The appeals were dismissed with costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=5887</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>