https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335210 The Court quashed the initial ex-parte order due to lack of opportunity granted to the Petitioner and non-receipt of the hearing notice. The Appeals were restored for a fresh decision, emphasizing the need to differentiate between rectification applications and recall requests. Despite the belated filing of the Writ Petition, substantial justice was prioritized, leading to the quashing of the initial order and subsequent rectification order for a fair reconsideration of the Appeals based on their merits and in accordance with the law. en-us Mon, 21 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 05 Apr 2017 18:05:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335210 The Court quashed the initial ex-parte order due to lack of opportunity granted to the Petitioner and non-receipt of the hearing notice. The Appeals were restored for a fresh decision, emphasizing the need to differentiate between rectification applications and recall requests. Despite the belated filing of the Writ Petition, substantial justice was prioritized, leading to the quashing of the initial order and subsequent rectification order for a fair reconsideration of the Appeals based on their merits and in accordance with the law. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 21 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335210