<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (11) TMI 1227 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335209</link>
    <description>A unit with no genuine plant, machinery, raw material stock or manufacturing activity was treated as a dummy or benami concern used with a related family-controlled entity to split clearances and wrongly claim small-scale industry exemption. Statements and records showed that production facilities and operations were at the other premises, while purchase and manufacture documents in the alleged unit&#039;s name were found fabricated. On that evidence, the exemption denial was upheld and the duty demand and penalties were sustained against both concerns.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2018 10:38:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=449666" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (11) TMI 1227 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335209</link>
      <description>A unit with no genuine plant, machinery, raw material stock or manufacturing activity was treated as a dummy or benami concern used with a related family-controlled entity to split clearances and wrongly claim small-scale industry exemption. Statements and records showed that production facilities and operations were at the other premises, while purchase and manufacture documents in the alleged unit&#039;s name were found fabricated. On that evidence, the exemption denial was upheld and the duty demand and penalties were sustained against both concerns.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335209</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>