<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (11) TMI 1210 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335192</link>
    <description>The Tribunal affirmed the decision on the applicability of excise duty and reimbursement of inspection charges on goods inspected by the buyer&#039;s agency. Despite the correctness of levying these charges, the appellant&#039;s mistake in not recovering them from the buyer was deemed significant. The Tribunal held that the appellant could not benefit from their own errors and dismissed the appeal, upholding the lower authorities&#039; order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2017 11:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=449622" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (11) TMI 1210 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335192</link>
      <description>The Tribunal affirmed the decision on the applicability of excise duty and reimbursement of inspection charges on goods inspected by the buyer&#039;s agency. Despite the correctness of levying these charges, the appellant&#039;s mistake in not recovering them from the buyer was deemed significant. The Tribunal held that the appellant could not benefit from their own errors and dismissed the appeal, upholding the lower authorities&#039; order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335192</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>