<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Cenvat credit denial u/r 4(5)(a) is unjustified; job worker&#039;s duty payment doesn&#039;t disqualify principal manufacturer.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=32245</link>
    <description>Cenvat credit - duty paid job work - whether the denial of Cenvat credit on the ground that job worker should have carried out job work under Rule 4(5)(a) of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, hence was not supposed to pay the duty, is justified? - Held No - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2016 11:46:05 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2016 11:46:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=449603" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Cenvat credit denial u/r 4(5)(a) is unjustified; job worker&#039;s duty payment doesn&#039;t disqualify principal manufacturer.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=32245</link>
      <description>Cenvat credit - duty paid job work - whether the denial of Cenvat credit on the ground that job worker should have carried out job work under Rule 4(5)(a) of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, hence was not supposed to pay the duty, is justified? - Held No - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2016 11:46:05 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=32245</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>