<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (11) TMI 1206 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335188</link>
    <description>Central excise duty was considered in relation to waste paper, aluminium foil waste and oil/sludge waste generated during cigarette manufacture and packing. The governing principle applied was that duty arises only on manufacture of excisable goods; waste or residue is not dutiable unless it satisfies the test of manufacture and is otherwise excisable in law. The Tribunal noted prior favouring treatment of the same issue for a later period, the absence of challenge by the Department, and consistent authority holding such wastes non-excisable. On that basis, the waste materials were treated as not liable to central excise duty and the assessee&#039;s challenge succeeded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2017 12:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=449600" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (11) TMI 1206 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335188</link>
      <description>Central excise duty was considered in relation to waste paper, aluminium foil waste and oil/sludge waste generated during cigarette manufacture and packing. The governing principle applied was that duty arises only on manufacture of excisable goods; waste or residue is not dutiable unless it satisfies the test of manufacture and is otherwise excisable in law. The Tribunal noted prior favouring treatment of the same issue for a later period, the absence of challenge by the Department, and consistent authority holding such wastes non-excisable. On that basis, the waste materials were treated as not liable to central excise duty and the assessee&#039;s challenge succeeded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335188</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>