<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1983 (10) TMI 2 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=5874</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court clarified the interpretation of wealth-tax law regarding the deduction of tax liabilities in computing net wealth. The Court ruled that deductions should be based on the tax as finally quantified on assessment, even if determined after the valuation date, as the assessment order supersedes the data in the assessee&#039;s return. The appeals were dismissed, upholding the High Court&#039;s decision, and costs were awarded to the respondent.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Feb 2014 11:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=44957" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1983 (10) TMI 2 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=5874</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court clarified the interpretation of wealth-tax law regarding the deduction of tax liabilities in computing net wealth. The Court ruled that deductions should be based on the tax as finally quantified on assessment, even if determined after the valuation date, as the assessment order supersedes the data in the assessee&#039;s return. The appeals were dismissed, upholding the High Court&#039;s decision, and costs were awarded to the respondent.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=5874</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>