https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335179 A writ petition challenging an assessment-related order under the M.P. VAT regime was not entertained because an effective statutory appeal and second appeal were available. The High Court held that the objections, including those on merits, could be examined by the appellate authority, and rejected the contention that the appeal was ineffective merely because of pre-deposit requirements. Writ jurisdiction was therefore treated as inappropriate where the statutory appellate mechanism remained available, and the petitioner was directed to pursue that remedy, including an application for condonation of delay. en-us Fri, 11 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 28 Nov 2016 11:19:35 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335179 A writ petition challenging an assessment-related order under the M.P. VAT regime was not entertained because an effective statutory appeal and second appeal were available. The High Court held that the objections, including those on merits, could be examined by the appellate authority, and rejected the contention that the appeal was ineffective merely because of pre-deposit requirements. Writ jurisdiction was therefore treated as inappropriate where the statutory appellate mechanism remained available, and the petitioner was directed to pursue that remedy, including an application for condonation of delay. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Fri, 11 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335179