https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188355 The court dismissed the writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, citing the availability of alternative remedies under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002. The court emphasized that the petitioner had statutory remedies for appeal before the Appellate Tribunal and High Court, and that the writ court should not intervene when effective alternative remedies exist. The court also noted that the provisional attachment order could be challenged through the adjudication process, appeal to the Appellate Tribunal, and further appeal to the High Court. Consequently, the court declined to entertain the writ petition and dismissed it. en-us Fri, 20 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 28 Nov 2016 11:14:23 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188355 The court dismissed the writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, citing the availability of alternative remedies under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002. The court emphasized that the petitioner had statutory remedies for appeal before the Appellate Tribunal and High Court, and that the writ court should not intervene when effective alternative remedies exist. The court also noted that the provisional attachment order could be challenged through the adjudication process, appeal to the Appellate Tribunal, and further appeal to the High Court. Consequently, the court declined to entertain the writ petition and dismissed it. Case-Laws Money Laundering Fri, 20 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188355