https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335174 Where the penalty under Section 55(6)(ea) of the Madhya Pradesh VAT Act, 2002 had been deposited and the seized goods were perishable, the High Court found a prima facie basis for interim release and held that continued detention was unwarranted at that stage; the goods were directed to be released within one week. As assessment proceedings were still pending, the Assessing Authority was directed to proceed in accordance with law, supply all documents to the petitioner, observe due procedure, and complete the assessment within three months. en-us Tue, 06 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 28 Nov 2016 11:13:06 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335174 Where the penalty under Section 55(6)(ea) of the Madhya Pradesh VAT Act, 2002 had been deposited and the seized goods were perishable, the High Court found a prima facie basis for interim release and held that continued detention was unwarranted at that stage; the goods were directed to be released within one week. As assessment proceedings were still pending, the Assessing Authority was directed to proceed in accordance with law, supply all documents to the petitioner, observe due procedure, and complete the assessment within three months. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Tue, 06 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335174