<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1981 (9) TMI 1 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=5862</link>
    <description>The SC held that sub-section (2) of section 52 applies only when consideration for transfer has been understated by the assessee, meaning actual consideration received exceeds the declared amount. The burden of proving such understatement or concealment lies with the revenue authorities, not the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 May 2025 15:04:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=44945" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1981 (9) TMI 1 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=5862</link>
      <description>The SC held that sub-section (2) of section 52 applies only when consideration for transfer has been understated by the assessee, meaning actual consideration received exceeds the declared amount. The burden of proving such understatement or concealment lies with the revenue authorities, not the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=5862</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>