<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Cenvat Credit</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=111163</link>
    <description>Credit on capital goods must be taken in two instalments-50% in the financial year of receipt and the balance in subsequent years. The introduc tion of a proviso to rule 4(1) raises a one year limitation issue: one view treats delayed first instalment claims as time barred and audit vulnerable, while others contend the remaining instalment remains claimable later and advise claiming substantial credits with intimation to the department.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 26 Nov 2016 13:19:59 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2025 15:56:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=449441" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Cenvat Credit</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=111163</link>
      <description>Credit on capital goods must be taken in two instalments-50% in the financial year of receipt and the balance in subsequent years. The introduc tion of a proviso to rule 4(1) raises a one year limitation issue: one view treats delayed first instalment claims as time barred and audit vulnerable, while others contend the remaining instalment remains claimable later and advise claiming substantial credits with intimation to the department.</description>
      <category>Discussion-Forum</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 26 Nov 2016 13:19:59 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=111163</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>