<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (11) TMI 1183 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335165</link>
    <description>Where an ex parte assessment was challenged for breach of natural justice, the High Court held that writ jurisdiction should not be exercised because the statute provided an appeal under Section 46 of the M.P. Commercial Tax Act and a further appeal to the Tribunal. The petitioner was relegated to the statutory remedy, with liberty to file the appeal within 30 days from receipt of the certified copy. The Tribunal was directed not to reject the appeal on limitation if it is filed within that period.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2016 14:38:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=449385" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (11) TMI 1183 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335165</link>
      <description>Where an ex parte assessment was challenged for breach of natural justice, the High Court held that writ jurisdiction should not be exercised because the statute provided an appeal under Section 46 of the M.P. Commercial Tax Act and a further appeal to the Tribunal. The petitioner was relegated to the statutory remedy, with liberty to file the appeal within 30 days from receipt of the certified copy. The Tribunal was directed not to reject the appeal on limitation if it is filed within that period.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335165</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>