<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (11) TMI 1181 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335163</link>
    <description>The court allowed the application for condonation of delay under Section 5 of the Limitation Act for a 6-day delay in filing the appeal. The reassessment proceedings under Sections 147/148 were initiated based on the non-genuineness of a gift received by the assessee, which was upheld by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) and ITAT. The court found no substantial question of law in the appeal, leading to its dismissal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Nov 2016 10:33:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=449383" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (11) TMI 1181 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335163</link>
      <description>The court allowed the application for condonation of delay under Section 5 of the Limitation Act for a 6-day delay in filing the appeal. The reassessment proceedings under Sections 147/148 were initiated based on the non-genuineness of a gift received by the assessee, which was upheld by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) and ITAT. The court found no substantial question of law in the appeal, leading to its dismissal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335163</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>