<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (11) TMI 1169 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335151</link>
    <description>The appeal was allowed as the Member (Judicial) found precedent in a prior case where CENVAT Credit for garden maintenance service was permitted. The impugned order denying credit was set aside, and any consequential relief was to be granted as per the law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Nov 2016 10:33:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=449371" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (11) TMI 1169 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335151</link>
      <description>The appeal was allowed as the Member (Judicial) found precedent in a prior case where CENVAT Credit for garden maintenance service was permitted. The impugned order denying credit was set aside, and any consequential relief was to be granted as per the law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335151</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>