<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (11) TMI 1165 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335147</link>
    <description>Outcome: The National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) dismissed the respondent&#039;s application challenging the maintainability of petitions under section 73(4) of the Companies Act, 2013. The Tribunal clarified that all deposits, regardless of when they were made, fall under the purview of the new Act. It affirmed the NCLT&#039;s jurisdiction to address grievances of depositors and rejected the argument that depositors should seek relief in Civil Courts. The respondents undertook to sell assets for repayment of dues to depositors, and concerns regarding directors fleeing the country were acknowledged, with actions initiated by the Registrar of Companies (RoC) to investigate alleged financial misconduct.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Nov 2016 10:32:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=449367" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (11) TMI 1165 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335147</link>
      <description>Outcome: The National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) dismissed the respondent&#039;s application challenging the maintainability of petitions under section 73(4) of the Companies Act, 2013. The Tribunal clarified that all deposits, regardless of when they were made, fall under the purview of the new Act. It affirmed the NCLT&#039;s jurisdiction to address grievances of depositors and rejected the argument that depositors should seek relief in Civil Courts. The respondents undertook to sell assets for repayment of dues to depositors, and concerns regarding directors fleeing the country were acknowledged, with actions initiated by the Registrar of Companies (RoC) to investigate alleged financial misconduct.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335147</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>