<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (11) TMI 1152 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335134</link>
    <description>The ITAT partly allowed the appeal, directing a reexamination of the ownership issue concerning the property and disallowance of expenditure under section 14A. The addition of income from other sources was contested, with the ITAT finding the ownership of the property not properly adjudicated and instructing a reevaluation by the Assessing Officer. The levy of interest under sections 234A, 234B, and 234C was not separately decided in the judgment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Nov 2016 10:32:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=449354" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (11) TMI 1152 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335134</link>
      <description>The ITAT partly allowed the appeal, directing a reexamination of the ownership issue concerning the property and disallowance of expenditure under section 14A. The addition of income from other sources was contested, with the ITAT finding the ownership of the property not properly adjudicated and instructing a reevaluation by the Assessing Officer. The levy of interest under sections 234A, 234B, and 234C was not separately decided in the judgment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335134</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>