<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (11) TMI 1146 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335128</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the legality of the assessment order passed under section 143(3) read with section 254 of the Income Tax Act, rejecting the appellant&#039;s challenge. The claim made under section 80IB of the Income Tax Act was allowed, amounting to Rs. 36,08,678, based on compliance with section 80IB(10) conditions. The Tribunal determined that the appellant had de facto ownership of the land, qualifying for the deduction. The explanations and evidence provided by the appellant were deemed sufficient, leading to a favorable decision. The application of section 263 was found unwarranted, and the appellant&#039;s deduction under section 80IB(10) was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Nov 2016 10:31:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=449345" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (11) TMI 1146 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335128</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the legality of the assessment order passed under section 143(3) read with section 254 of the Income Tax Act, rejecting the appellant&#039;s challenge. The claim made under section 80IB of the Income Tax Act was allowed, amounting to Rs. 36,08,678, based on compliance with section 80IB(10) conditions. The Tribunal determined that the appellant had de facto ownership of the land, qualifying for the deduction. The explanations and evidence provided by the appellant were deemed sufficient, leading to a favorable decision. The application of section 263 was found unwarranted, and the appellant&#039;s deduction under section 80IB(10) was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335128</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>