<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (11) TMI 1140 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335122</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the impugned orders for confiscation of imported goods and redemption fine due to mis-declaration of weight. However, the penalties imposed were set aside as they were deemed too harsh, despite finding no malafide intent by the appellants. The appeals were disposed of accordingly, with the orders modified to exclude the penalties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Nov 2016 16:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=449339" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (11) TMI 1140 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335122</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the impugned orders for confiscation of imported goods and redemption fine due to mis-declaration of weight. However, the penalties imposed were set aside as they were deemed too harsh, despite finding no malafide intent by the appellants. The appeals were disposed of accordingly, with the orders modified to exclude the penalties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335122</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>