<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (11) TMI 1139 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335121</link>
    <description>Interest arising from breach of export obligation under an exemption-based import scheme was treated as recoverable from the date the duty liability arose, and the limitation defence was rejected. Where concessional imports are made subject to fulfilment of export conditions and backed by a bond, failure to satisfy those conditions does not defeat recovery of interest merely by pleading time-bar. The statutory scheme and the bond undertaking supported enforcement of the demand, and the demand was held valid and enforceable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Nov 2016 10:31:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=449338" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (11) TMI 1139 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335121</link>
      <description>Interest arising from breach of export obligation under an exemption-based import scheme was treated as recoverable from the date the duty liability arose, and the limitation defence was rejected. Where concessional imports are made subject to fulfilment of export conditions and backed by a bond, failure to satisfy those conditions does not defeat recovery of interest merely by pleading time-bar. The statutory scheme and the bond undertaking supported enforcement of the demand, and the demand was held valid and enforceable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335121</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>