<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (11) TMI 1135 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335117</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the Commissioner (Appeals) order and remanded the case for reassessment of evidences to determine the eligibility of the SSI exemption notification. The case emphasized the need for a detailed analysis of evidences in excise duty cases to establish relationships between units for accurate application of exemption notifications and fair tax adjudication.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Nov 2016 10:31:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=449334" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (11) TMI 1135 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335117</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the Commissioner (Appeals) order and remanded the case for reassessment of evidences to determine the eligibility of the SSI exemption notification. The case emphasized the need for a detailed analysis of evidences in excise duty cases to establish relationships between units for accurate application of exemption notifications and fair tax adjudication.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335117</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>