<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (11) TMI 1121 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335103</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, directing the AO to delete the addition of Rs. 82,39,653. The IMD bonds received as gifts were held not to fall within the purview of &quot;any sum of money&quot; under Section 56(2)(v), and the interest on the IMD bonds was deemed exempt under Section 10(15)(iid)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal found the gifts genuine, with established donor creditworthiness, similar to a prior case, and concluded the addition by the AO was unjustified.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Nov 2016 10:30:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=449303" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (11) TMI 1121 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335103</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, directing the AO to delete the addition of Rs. 82,39,653. The IMD bonds received as gifts were held not to fall within the purview of &quot;any sum of money&quot; under Section 56(2)(v), and the interest on the IMD bonds was deemed exempt under Section 10(15)(iid)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal found the gifts genuine, with established donor creditworthiness, similar to a prior case, and concluded the addition by the AO was unjustified.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335103</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>