<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (11) TMI 1116 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335098</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed all appeals filed by M/s. BGH Exim Limited, upholding the order-in-original for customs duty and interest on imported goods. The Commissioner (Appeals) affirmed the clearance of goods on duty payment, citing legal precedents. Additionally, the Tribunal upheld the denial of amending Bills of Entry under the DEEC scheme after the warehousing period, following the Supreme Court decision in M/s. KLJ Plastics Limited. Permission denial for DEEC scheme clearance to M/s. Gujarat Fluro Chemical Limited was also upheld. The decision emphasized adherence to customs regulations and legal interpretations, leading to the dismissal of all appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2018 14:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=449298" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (11) TMI 1116 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335098</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed all appeals filed by M/s. BGH Exim Limited, upholding the order-in-original for customs duty and interest on imported goods. The Commissioner (Appeals) affirmed the clearance of goods on duty payment, citing legal precedents. Additionally, the Tribunal upheld the denial of amending Bills of Entry under the DEEC scheme after the warehousing period, following the Supreme Court decision in M/s. KLJ Plastics Limited. Permission denial for DEEC scheme clearance to M/s. Gujarat Fluro Chemical Limited was also upheld. The decision emphasized adherence to customs regulations and legal interpretations, leading to the dismissal of all appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335098</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>