<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (11) TMI 1112 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335094</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner&#039;s findings, ruling no tax liability for pre-1.6.2007 activities under commercial or industrial construction service and exempting Jammu and Kashmir services post-1.6.2007. The appellant was directed to pay any outstanding demand post-1.6.2007 under work contract service, subject to interest and a 25% penalty. The matter was remanded for demand calculation and issuance within 30 days, resulting in the disposal of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Apr 2017 16:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=449222" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (11) TMI 1112 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335094</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner&#039;s findings, ruling no tax liability for pre-1.6.2007 activities under commercial or industrial construction service and exempting Jammu and Kashmir services post-1.6.2007. The appellant was directed to pay any outstanding demand post-1.6.2007 under work contract service, subject to interest and a 25% penalty. The matter was remanded for demand calculation and issuance within 30 days, resulting in the disposal of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335094</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>