https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188311 Family pension was unavailable to the deceased employee's family because the service rules required pensionable service to be under government, substantive and permanent, and paid by government. The employee remained a work-charged employee throughout, was never regularised, and served in a non-pensionable establishment under a contributory provident fund arrangement. The family pension scheme in Appendix 1 applied only within its stated terms, and para 11 excluded work-charged staff. A prior High Court reliance on an earlier decision was misplaced because that case involved materially different facts. The claim for family pension was therefore not maintainable. en-us Tue, 22 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 25 Nov 2016 13:20:58 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188311 Family pension was unavailable to the deceased employee's family because the service rules required pensionable service to be under government, substantive and permanent, and paid by government. The employee remained a work-charged employee throughout, was never regularised, and served in a non-pensionable establishment under a contributory provident fund arrangement. The family pension scheme in Appendix 1 applied only within its stated terms, and para 11 excluded work-charged staff. A prior High Court reliance on an earlier decision was misplaced because that case involved materially different facts. The claim for family pension was therefore not maintainable. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 22 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188311