https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188309 Anganwadi workers and helpers appointed under the ICDS scheme were held not to occupy civil posts. Their appointments were scheme-based under a welfare programme, funded by the Central Government and implemented through the States, with honorarium instead of regular salary. Recruitment was made through a scheme committee, not under Article 309 service rules, and the usual indicia of a civil post were absent, including statutory creation and regular service conditions. Earlier authorities on civil posts were distinguished as involving statutory or rule-governed posts. The Administrative Tribunal therefore had no jurisdiction under Section 15. en-us Thu, 07 Dec 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 31 Mar 2022 17:37:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188309 Anganwadi workers and helpers appointed under the ICDS scheme were held not to occupy civil posts. Their appointments were scheme-based under a welfare programme, funded by the Central Government and implemented through the States, with honorarium instead of regular salary. Recruitment was made through a scheme committee, not under Article 309 service rules, and the usual indicia of a civil post were absent, including statutory creation and regular service conditions. Earlier authorities on civil posts were distinguished as involving statutory or rule-governed posts. The Administrative Tribunal therefore had no jurisdiction under Section 15. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 07 Dec 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188309