<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (11) TMI 1092 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335074</link>
    <description>The appeal was dismissed by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT NEW DELHI, upholding the order in favor of the Respondent regarding the eligibility for cenvat credit on iron and steel products. The Tribunal found that the Commissioner (Appeals) had appropriately considered evidence supporting the Respondent&#039;s position, which Revenue did not dispute. Therefore, the decision disallowing the cenvat credit was maintained, and the appeal by Revenue was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2017 11:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=449164" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (11) TMI 1092 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335074</link>
      <description>The appeal was dismissed by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT NEW DELHI, upholding the order in favor of the Respondent regarding the eligibility for cenvat credit on iron and steel products. The Tribunal found that the Commissioner (Appeals) had appropriately considered evidence supporting the Respondent&#039;s position, which Revenue did not dispute. Therefore, the decision disallowing the cenvat credit was maintained, and the appeal by Revenue was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335074</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>