<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (11) TMI 1074 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335056</link>
    <description>Section 71 of the Madhya Pradesh Commercial Tax Act permits only rectification of clerical or arithmetical mistakes, or errors arising from accidental slip or omission; it cannot be used to reopen a revisional order on merits or seek a rehearing. The revisional authority had considered the material and rejected it on factual grounds, and no perversity in those findings was shown. In writ jurisdiction under Article 226, the High Court will not act as an appellate forum over such factual determinations. The rectification application was therefore outside the scope of section 71, and no interference with the revisional order was warranted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Nov 2016 11:25:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=449145" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (11) TMI 1074 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335056</link>
      <description>Section 71 of the Madhya Pradesh Commercial Tax Act permits only rectification of clerical or arithmetical mistakes, or errors arising from accidental slip or omission; it cannot be used to reopen a revisional order on merits or seek a rehearing. The revisional authority had considered the material and rejected it on factual grounds, and no perversity in those findings was shown. In writ jurisdiction under Article 226, the High Court will not act as an appellate forum over such factual determinations. The rectification application was therefore outside the scope of section 71, and no interference with the revisional order was warranted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335056</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>