<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (10) TMI 491 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188306</link>
    <description>A non-cognizable offence under section 31 of the Representation of People Act, 1950 could not be investigated by police under section 154 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 without a Magistrate&#039;s order under section 155(2). The proviso to section 2(d) did not apply because it covers cases where a cognizable case later discloses only a non-cognizable offence. Since the investigation was without jurisdiction, the report prepared on its basis could not validly sustain cognizance, and the proceeding was quashed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Oct 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Nov 2016 11:06:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=449142" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (10) TMI 491 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188306</link>
      <description>A non-cognizable offence under section 31 of the Representation of People Act, 1950 could not be investigated by police under section 154 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 without a Magistrate&#039;s order under section 155(2). The proviso to section 2(d) did not apply because it covers cases where a cognizable case later discloses only a non-cognizable offence. Since the investigation was without jurisdiction, the report prepared on its basis could not validly sustain cognizance, and the proceeding was quashed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Oct 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188306</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>