<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (11) TMI 1066 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335048</link>
    <description>The tribunal allowed the appeal, quashing the reassessment proceedings initiated under Sections 147/148 due to lack of new tangible material and jurisdiction. The tribunal did not address the merits of the exemption claim under Section 54F as the primary issue of reassessment validity was decided in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Nov 2016 10:47:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=449133" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (11) TMI 1066 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335048</link>
      <description>The tribunal allowed the appeal, quashing the reassessment proceedings initiated under Sections 147/148 due to lack of new tangible material and jurisdiction. The tribunal did not address the merits of the exemption claim under Section 54F as the primary issue of reassessment validity was decided in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335048</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>