<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1980 (1) TMI 1 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=5829</link>
    <description>Expenditure incurred after derequisition of a colliery to renovate buildings, recondition machinery and remove debris for resuming mining operations was held to be revenue expenditure. The work merely restored an existing business unit to working condition in a continuing business, with no new asset created and no enduring advantage acquired. The special provision for current repairs did not prevent allowance under the general business-deduction provision merely because the items were not current repairs. As the outlay was wholly and exclusively for business purposes and incidental to the assessee&#039;s trade, it was deductible.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=44912" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1980 (1) TMI 1 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=5829</link>
      <description>Expenditure incurred after derequisition of a colliery to renovate buildings, recondition machinery and remove debris for resuming mining operations was held to be revenue expenditure. The work merely restored an existing business unit to working condition in a continuing business, with no new asset created and no enduring advantage acquired. The special provision for current repairs did not prevent allowance under the general business-deduction provision merely because the items were not current repairs. As the outlay was wholly and exclusively for business purposes and incidental to the assessee&#039;s trade, it was deductible.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=5829</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>