<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (10) TMI 920 - PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188297</link>
    <description>Recovery attributed to the petitioner, traced through a disclosure statement, consisted of pseudo ephedrine and intoxicating powder containing dextro propoxyphene hydrochloride. As the recovered quantity did not amount to commercial quantity, the statutory bar under Section 37 of the NDPS Act was held inapplicable on the facts. Regular bail was therefore granted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Nov 2016 10:24:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=449110" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (10) TMI 920 - PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188297</link>
      <description>Recovery attributed to the petitioner, traced through a disclosure statement, consisted of pseudo ephedrine and intoxicating powder containing dextro propoxyphene hydrochloride. As the recovered quantity did not amount to commercial quantity, the statutory bar under Section 37 of the NDPS Act was held inapplicable on the facts. Regular bail was therefore granted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188297</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>