https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188299 A writ challenge to a provisional attachment order and show cause notice under the Prevention of Money-Laundering Act was not entertained because adjudication proceedings under Section 8 were already pending and the issues raised involved mixed questions of fact and law. The petitioners were directed to place all objections and defences before the Adjudication Authority, which was asked to decide the matter expeditiously. The text also notes that Section 5(4) permits a person interested in the immovable property to enjoy it pending proceedings. en-us Wed, 13 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 25 Nov 2016 10:24:42 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188299 A writ challenge to a provisional attachment order and show cause notice under the Prevention of Money-Laundering Act was not entertained because adjudication proceedings under Section 8 were already pending and the issues raised involved mixed questions of fact and law. The petitioners were directed to place all objections and defences before the Adjudication Authority, which was asked to decide the matter expeditiously. The text also notes that Section 5(4) permits a person interested in the immovable property to enjoy it pending proceedings. Case-Laws Money Laundering Wed, 13 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188299