<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (11) TMI 1046 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335028</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that in the absence of any incriminating material found during the search and with the assessment proceedings not abated, the Assessing Officer had no jurisdiction to make additions under section 153A. Consequently, all additions made under section 153A/143(3) were deleted. The appeals by the assessees and cross objections were allowed, while the Department&#039;s appeals were dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Nov 2016 09:45:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=449094" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (11) TMI 1046 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335028</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that in the absence of any incriminating material found during the search and with the assessment proceedings not abated, the Assessing Officer had no jurisdiction to make additions under section 153A. Consequently, all additions made under section 153A/143(3) were deleted. The appeals by the assessees and cross objections were allowed, while the Department&#039;s appeals were dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335028</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>