<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (11) TMI 1035 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335017</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal by directing the deletion of the addition of Rs. 5,86,900 as unaccounted cash. The issues related to gold and diamond jewelry were remitted back to the Assessing Officer for fresh consideration. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was treated as allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Nov 2016 09:45:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=449083" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (11) TMI 1035 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335017</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal by directing the deletion of the addition of Rs. 5,86,900 as unaccounted cash. The issues related to gold and diamond jewelry were remitted back to the Assessing Officer for fresh consideration. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was treated as allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335017</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>