<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (11) TMI 1031 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335013</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, rejecting reclassification by the TPO and DRP and determining the interest rate. It emphasized respecting the transaction&#039;s true nature, applying appropriate comparables and rates. The AO was directed to verify disallowance computation under section 14A with Rule 8D and make necessary adjustments. Penalty proceedings under section 271(1)(c) were deemed premature.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2016 10:53:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=449079" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (11) TMI 1031 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335013</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, rejecting reclassification by the TPO and DRP and determining the interest rate. It emphasized respecting the transaction&#039;s true nature, applying appropriate comparables and rates. The AO was directed to verify disallowance computation under section 14A with Rule 8D and make necessary adjustments. Penalty proceedings under section 271(1)(c) were deemed premature.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335013</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>